Meeting Thursday Oct. 30, 2003 Note-taker: Sam Snacks: Paul Hal will take notes next time. Emilie will bring snacks next time. Hal: Stephen, could you explain your suggestion about simplifying the calculations I was doing in Maple regarding the Soddy equation and the Apollonian gasket? Stephen: Sure. What you want to do is to use four variables instead of three. [Stephen draws the tangent circles and writes Soddy's equation 2(a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2) = (a+b+c+d)^2] [Hal will work on this during the meeting and report back] Stephen: One we thing we still need to resolve is the assertion in the Itsara article which Sam brought up on Tuesday that an arbitrary snake can be transformed into a 2-by-k straight snake for some k, with only single and double edges. Martin: Do we believe this to be true? Paul: We do not currently have a way of doing it. [Hal goes up to the board. He has an idea of extending snakes instead of collapsing them. It amounts to having straight snakes with double, single, or *zero* edges.] Hal: Clearly doesn't match up with claim, but might be useful somehow. Martin: I'd also like to work on the alternating pattern in the matchings of the 2-by-2-by-n snakes. Emilie: I have been working on Jim's idea, where we split a triangle into six and have some way of ascribing rational values to the sides. I have a system of nine (non-linear) equations that I am going to try to solve in Maple. Stephen: We'll work in groups or individually and then reconvene at ten till to summarize for the minutes. [At 5:20 . . .] Stephen: I'll start. I mostly talked with Sam about the Itsara assertion, and I read some of Cluster Algebras II. Abby: Talked with Carl about what he has been working on - matchings of faces of cubes. Also talked with Paul about some possible bijections (or even well-defined maps) of 2-by-2-by-n snake graph matchings and pairs of tilings of the 3-by-2n grid. Downloaded graph.tcl and got it to work sufficiently well. Martin: Worked with Hal and his Apollonian gasket cluster algebra equations in Maple. Worked with Paul a little also on the above. Perhaps my previous bijection between partial sums of the one sequence (1,3,11,41,153,...) and the other sequence (1,4,15,56,209,...) could be of some help. Hal: Worked on the Apollonian gasket and programming in Maple, I still ended up with lots of nested radicals. [Stephen interjects and draws Soddy's equation on the board] Stephen: It's like the Markoff recurrence where we have been substituting. Hal: Oh, I see it. I'll have something for next time for sure. Sam: Worked with Stephen. Realized a few things. First, the assertion is not true for arbitrary snakes, in fact, it is not true for "staircase snakes" at all (that is, snakes with n boxes and n+1 matchings). Martin was able to show exhaustively that there is no such configuartion of a straight rectangle with double and single edges having six perfect matchings. Second, Stephen and I sketched a proof of why this identifying vertices around a corner maneuver gives the same number of matchings as the original graph. I can write this up. What's left is to understand why the graphs in question in the Itsara article are never staircases (or never even have staircase pieces). Emilie: Worked on my system of equations. Carl: Conversed with everyone and played around a bit with matchings of faces of cubes.